MODULE 6: INDUSTRY AND COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS
Industry Analysis
LOS
- Describe the purposes of, and steps involved in, industry and competitive analysis.
- Describe industry classification methods and compare methods by which companies can be grouped.
- Determine an industry’s size, growth characteristics, profitability, and market share trends.
- Do not analyse a company in a vacuum. First ask: what kind of battlefield is this business fighting in? A strong company in a rotten industry can still disappoint you. A merely decent company in a beautiful industry can make you look smart.
- Industry analysis helps you do three things.
WHAT INDUSTRY ANALYSIS IS DOING FOR YOU
- Improve forecasts, because industry forces shape prices, costs, market share, and margins.
- Identify investment opportunities, because sometimes the best insight is not “this company is great” but “this whole industry is getting structurally better or worse.”
- Estimate the industry base rate. In plain English, competition keeps pulling firms back toward the normal profitability of the industry unless they have a real edge.
- Think of it like airlines versus software. Even a brilliantly run airline still faces brutal fuel costs, fixed costs, and price wars. Meanwhile a decent software company with sticky customers can often earn much better returns. The ceiling is different before the management team even shows up.
- During the dot-com bubble, many investors behaved as if “internet” itself was a business model and an industry analysis. It was neither. Companies with no moat were valued like kings simply because they were in a fashionable narrative. Right now it is happening for AI.
- The step-by-step flow is simple.
INDUSTRY ANALYSIS FLOW
- Define the industry.
- Survey the industry: size, growth, profitability, market share.
- Study the structure using Porter’s Five Forces.
- Study outside pressures using political, economic, social, technological, legal, and environmental analysis.
- Judge where the company sits inside that landscape.
WHY INDUSTRY ANALYSIS MATTERS
Suppose you are comparing a cigarette company and a semiconductor company. The cigarette company may barely grow volume, face taxes, lawsuits, packaging restrictions, and constant public hostility. The semiconductor company may face brutal cycles, but if demand for artificial intelligence chips explodes, the whole industry can re-rate upward. Same stock market. Totally different gravity. That is why industry analysis comes before you fall in love with management commentary. The industry tells you what kind of game is being played, and the company tells you how well it plays that game.
-
GICS: Sector ⟶ Group ⟶ Industry ⟶ Sub-industry [SGISub]
ICB: Industry ⟶ Supersector ⟶ Sector ⟶ Subsector [ISSS]
TRBC: Economic sector ⟶ Business sector ⟶ Group ⟶ Industry ⟶ Activity [EBGIA] G for Group, S always for Sector, B for business, I for Industry -
How to classify? c
CLASSIFICATION RULES
- Single business: classify in that business.
- Multiple businesses: use the one with ≥60% revenue.
- If not: use ≥50% of revenue, profit, or assets.
- If still unclear: use judgment or label conglomerate.
- These schemes are useful, but do not worship them. They are filing cabinets, not reality. Amazon.com is the classic headache. Is it retail? Is it cloud computing? Is it logistics? If you blindly accept one label, you can miss the economics of the segment that actually makes the money.
- Strict hierarchies create a real problem: multi-business firms get shoved into one box. That box may be legally tidy and analytically useless.
- Geography matters too. A hospital in France and a hospital in the United Arab Emirates may both be “healthcare services,” but reimbursement rules, regulation, and patient behaviour can be so different that throwing them together tells you very little.
- Other ways to group companies could be on the basis of business cycle, geography, financial measures, or environmental, social, and governance scores. Consumer staples and utilities are usually defensive. Industrials, materials, and many consumer discretionary businesses are usually cyclical.
- Industry size = sales of the product or service you are actually studying, not total corporate sales. If a company sells USD 100 billion of total revenue, but only USD 40 billion comes from smartphones, then for smartphone industry sizing you use USD 40 billion, not the full company sales.
- Growth industries still have room to penetrate their addressable market. Mature industries are already saturated and tend to grow roughly with the broader economy or even shrink if substitutes steal demand. Semiconductors can still behave like a growth industry. Tobacco is the classic mature or declining example.
- Characterise growth in two dimensions.
GROWTH CHECK
- How fast is it growing?
- How sensitive is it to the business cycle?
- Mature does not mean dead. It just means the easy land grab is over. A mature grocery chain grows differently from a young software platform. One mostly rides population, inflation, and share shifts. The other may still be grabbing new users at a fast clip.
- Profitability: use return on invested capital (the return earned on operating capital regardless of debt mix) where possible, because it is cleaner than return on equity when firms use very different leverage. If that is hard to get for an entire industry, use operating margins for major listed players as a practical shortcut.
- Market share =
- Do not obsess over the exact last decimal place of market share. The trend matters more than the point estimate. If Netflix keeps taking share from linear television, that trend tells you far more than whether its exact share this quarter is 12.1% or 12.4%.
- Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (industry concentration) = sum of squared market shares. Use whole percentages, not decimals.
HERFINDAHL-HIRSCHMAN INDEX RULE OF THUMB
- Less than
1,500= low concentration. 1,500to2,500= moderate concentration.- More than
2,500= high concentration.
- Why concentration matters: if ten firms all have tiny shares and sell similar products, they usually fight harder on price. If two or three giants dominate, price discipline is easier. Not guaranteed, but common.
- Good cautionary example: the airline industry has become more concentrated in many markets, yet competition can still be vicious because the product is easy to compare and fixed costs are brutal. So concentration helps, but it is not a magic wand.
MEMORISE
- Industry analysis tells you the base rate for growth and profitability before you judge the company.
- Define the industry first, then survey size, growth, profitability, and market share.
- Third-party classifications are useful shortcuts, not truth handed down by God.
- Market share trend matters more than one exact point estimate.
- High concentration often softens competition, but only if products are not easy to compare and undercut.
HERFINDAHL-HIRSCHMAN INDEX QUICK NUMERICAL
Problem: An industry has three firms with market shares of 50%, 30%, and 20%. Find the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index and classify the industry.
Solution:
The industry is highly concentrated because 3,800 is above 2,500.
Explanation: You square the shares because concentration should punish dominance more heavily. A market with one giant and many tiny players is much more concentrated than a market with evenly spread shares.
Quick checks
- Size the industry using the relevant product sales, not total company revenue.
- If the company has many segments, ask which segment actually belongs in your industry definition.
- Compare industry growth with gross domestic product growth to judge whether the industry is mature or still in a growth phase.
- If you use Herfindahl-Hirschman Index, use 50, not 0.50.
Industry Structure and Competitive Positioning
- Of the five forces described next, if some or all of them are strong, then firms will likely earn zero or close to zero economic profits (return on invested capital minus cost).
-
Porter's Five Forces (internal analysis of industry) > Rivalry, new entrants, and substitutes usually make life worse for profits. Strong customer power squeezes price. Strong supplier power squeezes cost.
- Rivalry: Rivalry is highest when many similar firms face slow growth and high fixed costs, forcing price cuts to stay at full capacity. Delta Air Lines, United Airlines, and American Airlines cut fares aggressively because planes, fuel contracts, and crews are fixed costs and demand grows slowly.
- Barriers to Entry: Saudi Aramco and ExxonMobil face little new competition because oil production needs billions in drilling, refining, and scale.
- Threat of substitutes: Substitutes cap pricing by making demand more price-sensitive. A patented drug maker such as Pfizer may enjoy pricing power until a substitute, generic, or alternative treatment appears.
- Bargaining power of buyers: Buyers of addictive goods such as cigarettes have low bargaining power because they are less likely to switch on small price changes.
- Bargaining power of suppliers: A critical supplier with unique technology can squeeze the industry. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, the company that manufactures advanced chips for Apple and others, is a better example than Microsoft here because it literally sits inside the hardware supply chain. 3.1 Porter’s Five Forces is just a pressure map. You are asking who can hurt industry profits and how badly. If everyone around the firm has a knife, returns stay low. If the firm is surrounded by weak players and loyal customers, returns stay high.
WHY PORTER'S FIVE FORCES WORKS
Imagine you open a tea stall outside a college. If ten other tea stalls open next to you tomorrow, students can compare prices in ten seconds. Your profit dies. If milk suppliers double prices, your profit dies. If students switch to a coffee vending machine, your profit dies. If the college itself opens a subsidised café, your profit dies. That is the whole model. It is just a disciplined way of asking: who can squeeze me, replace me, copy me, or outlast me? This is the right framework because long-run industry profit is determined less by one heroic company and more by the bargaining power and alternatives around it.
- Threat of new entrants is high when it is cheap and easy to enter. Restaurants are the classic example. Tens of thousands open every year. Banking is the opposite: licenses, regulation, trust, and compliance make entry slow and expensive.
- New entrants are weaker when incumbents enjoy the following advantages.
WHAT KEEPS NEW ENTRANTS OUT
- Network effects. Visa and Mastercard become more useful as more cardholders and merchants join.
- Economies of scale. A cloud-computing giant spreads fixed server costs over massive volume.
- Economies of scope. A retailer with pharmacies, petrol stations, and stores can leverage the same real estate and customer traffic.
- Brand loyalty. Red Bull or Marlboro are harder to copy than generic flour or sugar.
- Switching costs. A company running its operations on SAP software cannot casually switch on a Friday afternoon.
- Threat of substitutes asks a different question: if the customer does not buy this product, what else solves the same problem?
- Streaming video was the substitute that hurt cable television. Video calls became a substitute for a lot of business travel. Plant-based meat is trying to become a substitute for animal protein.
- Substitutes matter even when they look “different.” A restaurant is a substitute for cooking at home. A gaming subscription is a substitute for some other entertainment spending. The customer budget is one pool.
- Bargaining power of customers rises when buyers are concentrated, products are standardised, the product is a big chunk of their budget, or they can build the thing themselves.
- Bargaining power of suppliers rises when suppliers are few, specialised, hard to replace, or costly to switch away from. This is why semiconductor manufacturing, aircraft engines, and some specialised software inputs give suppliers real power.
- Rivalry among existing competitors is often the nastiest force in the room. High fixed costs, slow growth, little differentiation, and many equal-sized competitors make price wars more likely. Airlines, autos, and generic drugs are famous for this.
- The generic-drug business is a great example. Once patents expire, several manufacturers can sell chemically identical pills. Customers do not care who made them. Price competition gets ugly very fast.
- A useful real-world scandal memory hook: when Boeing pushed hard on production and competition with Airbus, the pressure of rivalry, cost control, and execution created terrible downstream consequences in the 737 MAX saga. That was not “Porter’s Five Forces” alone, but it is a reminder that competitive pressure can push firms into bad decisions.
- After Five Forces, look outside the industry using political, economic, social, technological, legal, and environmental analysis. This is less about current profitability and more about where the world may be pushing the industry next.
- Political: tariffs, subsidies, healthcare reimbursement, defence spending, fuel policy, sanctions. Oil and defence are obvious political industries.
- Economic: growth, inflation, interest rates, exchange rates. Car sales and housing are very exposed because they depend on financing costs and consumer confidence.
- Social: demographics, habits, fashion, wellness trends, public opinion. Lululemon benefited from the wellness trend. Tobacco suffered from the opposite kind of social trend.
- Technological: sustaining versus disruptive innovation. Sustaining innovation improves the existing product. Disruptive innovation changes the game. Cable television improved for years in a sustaining way; streaming disrupted it.
- Legal: lawsuits, restrictions, packaging rules, approvals, licensing, data privacy, antitrust. Tobacco and cannabis are full of legal risk. So are big technology platforms.
- Environmental: emissions rules, waste rules, water usage, land restrictions, climate transition risk. Utilities, autos, airlines, and energy cannot ignore this anymore.
- Real-world example: Netflix disrupted cable television. That was not just a technology story. It was also a social shift in how people wanted to watch content, an economic shift in how households budgeted entertainment, and a competitive shock to the old bundled cable model. Good industry analysis notices that these forces often move together.
- Now come competitive strategies.
THE THREE BIG COMPETITIVE PATHS
- Cost leadership: be the low-cost machine.
- Differentiation: offer something customers genuinely value and cannot easily compare on price alone.
- Focus: serve a narrow group better than broad rivals can.
- Walmart is the classic cost leadership story. Apple is the classic differentiation story. A niche luxury safari lodge serving a very specific type of wealthy traveller is a focus story.
- Cost leadership works when customers are price-conscious and product differences are small. The weapons are scale, discipline, supply-chain efficiency, cheap distribution, and ruthless cost control.
- Differentiation works when customers care about quality, brand, service, design, convenience, or ecosystem. The danger is that the premium becomes absurd and customers stop paying for the sparkle.
- Focus works when a narrow group has distinct needs that larger firms serve badly or uneconomically. A premium pilgrimage-tour operator or a software product made only for small dental clinics can win this way.
- The dangerous place is being stuck in the middle. You are not cheapest, not special, and not targeted. That is where mediocre companies go to die slowly.
MEMORISE
- Five Forces asks who can squeeze long-run industry profits: entrants, substitutes, buyers, suppliers, and rivals.
- Political, economic, social, technological, legal, and environmental analysis looks at outside forces changing growth and market-share dynamics.
- Sustaining innovation improves the old game. Disruptive innovation changes the game.
- Competitive strategy usually fits one bucket: cost leadership, differentiation, or focus.
- A firm should defend against industry forces, fit external trends, and have the resources to execute.
HERFINDAHL-HIRSCHMAN INDEX AND REGULATORY RISK
Problem: Four firms have market shares of 30%, 30%, 20%, and 20%. A regulator wants to know whether the industry is already concentrated before a merger review. Find the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index.
Solution:
The industry is highly concentrated because the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index is above 2,500.
Explanation: Once concentration is already high, regulators become much more nervous about mergers because fewer rivals usually means softer price competition.
Quick checks
- Five Forces is about industry profitability. Political, economic, social, technological, legal, and environmental analysis is more about outside forces changing growth and share.
- If the product is easy to compare and switching is easy, assume stronger customer power or stronger rivalry.
- If the firm needs patents, licences, heavy capital, or network scale, assume lower threat of new entrants.
- When judging strategy, ask three things: does it defend against the forces, fit the outside trends, and can management actually execute it?
- PESTLE (external analysis):
- political, Trump may impose tariffs on your raw materials and you are bankrupt. Eg: Post tariff children toy industry in US.
- economic, Economic cycles affect your business, an upcoming interest rate hike might wreck your leveraged business.
- social, This is how society reacts to a business, for example, don't try starting a beef factory in India (although its legal, but don't).
- technological, streaming video disrupted cable television; this is not a prettier cable box, this is a different business model.
- legal, plain packaging rules, lawsuits, and advertising restrictions changed tobacco economics for decades.
- environmental, stricter emissions rules can make life harder for airlines, autos, and fossil-fuel producers while helping cleaner alternatives.