MODULE 3: MARKET EFFICIENCY
Market Efficiency
- In an efficient market, prices already reflect all available information, so they're fair estimates of value; the return you earn is just pay for risk, not for being clever — in short, you can't consistently beat the market.
- When markets are efficient, passive investing makes sense because active trading gets eaten up by fees and costs; only when prices are genuinely wrong does active investing have a chance to add value.
- Prices move only on surprises, not on expected news: earnings up 45% is good, bad, or irrelevant depending entirely on what the market had already priced in.
- Market value is the asset's current price, while intrinsic (fundamental) value is what a fully informed, rational investor would be willing to pay; in highly efficient markets, the two usually line up, but in less efficient markets active investors try to buy below intrinsic value and sell above it.
- Intrinsic value is based on fundamentals — for a bond, this means coupon, maturity, default risk, liquidity, and other key characteristics. Intrinsic value is constantly changing as new (unexpected) information becomes available.
- Information + attention: markets are more efficient when lots of participants track them and when information is public, timely, and equally available. Fewer analysts, poor disclosure, or selective leaks ⟶ slower price adjustment and mispricing.
- Ability to trade and correct prices: arbitrage and short selling pull prices back to fair value, but only if trading is easy. High transaction costs, low liquidity, funding limits, or short-sale constraints let wrong prices survive.
- Costs decide real efficiency: markets are efficient if, after all information, trading, and funding costs, no positive risk-adjusted returns are left. Beating the market before fees doesn't count if you lose after fees.
- When we talk about market efficiency ⟶ We talk about return adjusted for risk. For this you need a model for expected returns such as CAPM.
- Weak Form Efficiency:
- Costs decide real efficiency: markets are efficient if, after all information, trading, and funding costs, no positive risk-adjusted returns are left. Beating the market before fees doesn’t count if you lose after fees.
- When we talk about market efficiency → We talk about return adjusted for risk. For this you need a model for expected returns such as CAPM.
- Technical analysis seeks to earn positive risk-adjusted returns by using historical price and volume (trading) data. These guys just harvest risk premia.
- Weak Form Efficiency:
- Market prices reflect all the information in the historical market data. An investor cannot achieve positive risk-adjusted returns on average by using technical analysis because past price and volume (market) information will have no predictive power.
- Trading on fundamentals or Trading on private information can still give you an edge.
- Semi-Strong-Form Efficiency:
- Current security prices fully reflect all publicly available market and non information.
- Trading on private information can still give you an edge.
- Strong-Form Efficiency:
- Security prices fully reflect all information from both public and private sources.
- You just can't beat the market.
- Tests indicate that mutual fund performance has been inferior to that of a passive index strategy.
- The majority of evidence is that anomalies are not violations of market efficiency but are due to the research methodologies used.
- Event studies test semi-strong efficiency: they ask whether you can make abnormal profits after public news. In developed markets, prices adjust almost immediately, so the null holds. Example: Apple launches a new iPhone, the stock barely moves on launch day because it's already priced in. In less efficient markets, even well-known events (like Diwali sales numbers) can lead to slow, multi-day price reactions.
- Market Anomalies break market efficiency. Momentum is an anomaly. Small cap outperforming Large cap is an anomaly (Size Effect). Low P/E ratio stocks outperform High P/E ones (Value Effect). Price action die to earning surprises persist for days, IPOs are typically underpriced, NAV of closed end MF is undervalued.
- Information cascade: less-informed investors copy early, better-informed traders; if the early movers truly have superior information, this herding can actually help prices move closer to intrinsic value rather than distort them.